OVERVIEW
Protractor and Selenium are considered among the most popular testing frameworks that have transformed automation testing. Their powerful features and capabilities have revolutionized the way software testing is approached. However, with the abundance of options, choosing between Protractor and Selenium can be a daunting task.
In this detailed guide, we will deeply dive into the differences between Protractor vs Selenium. Whether you are a developer, a tester, or a QA professional, understanding the distinctions between Protractor and Selenium is crucial for optimizing your automation testing efforts. With this detailed difference between Protractor vs Selenium, we aim to deliver the knowledge needed to make the correct framework choice.
Selenium is a free and open-source tool that allows testers to automate web browsers with ease. It provides a seamless way to write test scripts using various programming languages such as Ruby, Java, NodeJS, PHP, Perl, Python, C#, and more. What sets Selenium apart from other automation frameworks is its support for multiple programming languages, including Python, Java, JavaScript, C#, PHP, and Ruby.
If you're new to Selenium and want to leverage its power for web automation testing with Python, you can start by exploring the Selenium Python tutorial. It will be a helpful resource to maximize your use of Selenium and Python in your testing endeavors.
Built on WebDriverJS, Protractor is a commonly used end-to-end testing framework designed to automate Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor extends the capabilities of WebDriverJS by offering a simplified API tailored for testing Angular applications. This API enables testers to write tests in JavaScript, leveraging the power of WebDriverJS while providing additional support for Angular-specific features.
Protractor's native support for Angular sets it apart from Selenium. It understands Angular-specific behavior, such as two-way data binding, dynamic element updates, and asynchronous tasks. This specialized support allows testers to write tests that align closely with how Angular applications work.
Protractor is built on top of WebDriverJS, which is the JavaScript implementation of Selenium WebDriver. This means that Protractor utilizes the underlying capabilities of Selenium WebDriver to interact with web browsers. By combining Protractor and Selenium, you can leverage the specialized Angular support of Protractor while also benefiting from the extensive language support, community, and browser compatibility of Selenium.
This integration allows you to utilize the strengths of both frameworks. Protractor's specialized support for Angular ensures efficient testing of Angular applications, while Selenium provides the versatility and broad language support required for testing a wide range of web applications.
Protractor and Selenium are two popular frameworks used for automating web testing. Let's explore their features, advantages, and drawbacks in detail:
To sum up, Protractor is specifically tailored for Angular applications, offering specialized features, while Selenium is a versatile framework supporting multiple programming languages and browsers. Both have advantages and disadvantages, and the choice depends on the specific requirements of your project.
Let us now look at the detailed feature comparison for Protractor vs Selenium.
Features | Selenium | Protractor |
---|---|---|
Front-end technology-based web application support. | Supports all front-end technologies. | Primarily designed for Angular applications but can also support other technologies. |
Language support | C#, Java, Haskell, Perl, PHP, JavaScript, Objective-C, Ruby, Python, R. | JavaScript and TypeScript. |
Compatible browsers | Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, Microsoft Edge, Opera, Safari, HtmlUnitDriver. | Chrome, Internet Explorer, Firefox, Microsoft Edge, Safari. |
Waiting or synchronization | Requires explicit synchronization using different wait methods. | Automatically waits for Angular applications; explicit synchronization needed for non-Angular applications. |
Locator strategy support | Common strategies (Id, className, name, linkText, tagName, partial link text, XPath, CSS) for all web applications. | Common strategies plus specific Angular locators (repeater, model, option, binding, etc.). |
Test frameworks support | Supports various frameworks based on the language binding (NUnit, JUnit, PyUnit, etc.). | Supports Mocha and Jasmine by default; also compatible with Cucumber and Serenity/JS. |
BDD support | Yes (Serenity, Cucumber, JBehave, etc.). | Yes (Mocha, Jasmine, Cucumber, Serenity/JS). |
Execution nature | Synchronous | Asynchronous |
Technical skills requirement | High | High |
Test-script stability | Less stable | More stable |
Parallel testing | Can be achieved using compatible grids. | Built-in support for parallel testing. |
Choosing between Protractor and Selenium depends on various factors based on your specific requirements, project context, and team preferences. Given below are some of the important factors to consider when making your decision:
By carefully evaluating these factors and understanding the features of both Protractor and Selenium, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your test automation needs and project goals.
In conclusion, Protractor and Selenium are both powerful test automation frameworks with their own strengths and use cases. Protractor is specifically tailored for Angular and AngularJS applications, providing specialized support and seamless integration with JavaScript testing frameworks. It offers a simplified API, automatic waiting for Angular tasks and native support for Angular-specific features.
On the other hand, Selenium offers versatility, extensive language support, and a broad community. It excels in cross-browser testing, parallel execution, and handling a wide range of web applications.
Devansh Bhardwaj works as a Product Marketing Executive at LambdaTest. With a degree in Business Administration and a keen interest in technology, he loves to write about the latest technology trends.
Reviewer's Profile
Shahzeb Hoda
Shahzeb currently holds the position of Senior Product Marketing Manager at LambdaTest and brings a wealth of experience spanning over a decade in Quality Engineering, Security, and E-Learning domains. Over the course of his 3-year tenure at LambdaTest, he actively contributes to the review process of blogs, learning hubs, and product updates. With a Master's degree (M.Tech) in Computer Science and a seasoned expert in the technology domain, he possesses extensive knowledge spanning diverse areas of web development and software testing, including automation testing, DevOps, continuous testing, and beyond.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!